AUGUST 2016 •
PPB
• 59
American
Dragon
town, in every state in this coun-
try, is looking to corral that glam-
orous high-tech company, and it’s
tempting to swing for the fences.
But if state and local govern-
ments really want to help manu-
facturers, they should look for
solid singles and doubles hitters,
regardless of the industry—espe-
cially if that mid-size manufac-
turer has implemented fewer,
faster, finer.
Invest In Education And
Infrastructure
Winter 2015 was particularly
tough in Rhode Island, and one
of its main side effects—pot-
holes—shines a light on the dis-
mal state of our country’s infra-
structure. A 2013 report card on
America’s infrastructure, pre-
pared by the American Society
of Civil Engineers, graded our
bridges at C+, noting that one in
nine of our roadway bridges is
structurally deficient and that the
average age of the over 600,000
bridges in this country is 42
years. Inland waterways, which
carry the equivalent of 51 million
truck trips each year, received a
D- grade due to the generally
poor condition of locks and
channels that need dredging. The
condition of our roads was grad-
ed D, transit systems D, energy
grid D+ and aviation D. Because
the state of our infrastructure has
a direct relationship with our
ability to compete globally, it
must be addressed. Aging infra-
structure is a sure sign that we
have lost our edge as a world
leader.
In a document prepared for
The American Road and
Transportation Builders
Association, James Pinkerton
and Bob Patterson make a com-
pelling case for the past and
future importance of government
funded infrastructure. They take
the reader through the historical
and political figures, from
George Washington to Dwight
D. Eisenhower, who had the
vision and tenacity to ensure that
the U.S. had the world’s best
waterways, railroads and high-
ways. And they take us through
the slow steady decline since the
1970s, linking our deteriorating
infrastructure with the loss of
manufacturing jobs.
Pinkerton and Patterson
[authors of
A Vision of American
Strength: How Infrastructure Built
the United States
] note that “per-
haps the most far-reaching con-
sequence of the collapse of U.S
infrastructure has been the corre-
sponding loss of manufacturing
jobs and the waning of America’s
middle class. When a country
scrimps on infrastructure, or kills
big public projects, it also side-
lines its manufacturing sector.
That overlooked side effect has
weakened America by marginal-
izing the 65 percent of the U.S.
workforce without college
degrees, whose livelihoods, since
the days of Henry Ford, have
largely depended on making
material things.”
Meanwhile, in the American
Society of Civil Engineers
report, the conditions of our
public school facilities received a
D grade. Much has been written
about the “knowledge gap”
between available jobs and the
unemployed, and that gap must
be bridged. But bridging it
begins with a better school envi-
ronment. As a nation, we will
never produce better students
until we provide better school
buildings, better equipment and
a clean, safe environment in
which to learn.
In many respects, develop-
ments in the high technology
sector of our economy have
blinded us to the dangers of our
crumbling infrastructure. Garry
Kasparov and Silicon Valley
investor Peter Thiel, in a 2013
Financial Times
op-ed, wrote
that “we can now use our phones
to send cute kitten photos
around the world or watch
episodes of
The Jetsons
while rid-
ing a century-old subway; we can
programme software to simulate
futuristic landscapes. But the
actual landscape around us is
almost identical to the 1960s.”
Encourage Corporate
Patriotism
In August 2014, the
Walgreens store chain
announced they were going to
complete their purchase of a
smaller European rival and move
their corporate headquarters to
Switzerland in order to take
advantage of the European coun-
try’s lower tax rate. Public reac-
tion, largely fueled by social
media, was swift and vehemently
opposed to the maneuver. Days
after the announcement,
Walgreens reversed course and
decided against the maneuver,
known as a tax inversion.
In a tax inversion deal, a U.S.
company acquires a (usually)
smaller company in another
country with lower tax rates,
“merges” with that company, and
moves its nominal headquarters
to the lower tax country. It’s not
illegal. However, if a U.S. based
company does a tax inversion
deal—which helps them avoid
U.S. taxes—should they still be
considered a U.S. company? Not
in my book. They may still mar-
ket themselves as though they
are a U.S. company, but if your
headquarters isn’t in the U.S.
you’re no longer a U.S. company.
What spiked the social media
uproar was that Walgreens had
traditionally positioned itself as a
“Main Street USA” company, and
would have certainly continued
to do so after the financial
maneuver.
Walgreens’ decision to forego
its tax inversion was, in many
Get your own copy of
American Dragon: Winning
the Global Manufacturing
War Using the Universal
Principles of Fewer, Faster,
and Finer
by Michael
McKeldon Woody at special
member pricing of $15.98 at
www.shop.ppai.org/books.