Previous Page  67 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 67 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

business-to-consumer electronic

communications in this industry,

the sender includes (or would

certainly like to include) some

form of promotional material

or information such as dates

for an upcoming event, a link

to a product, good or service,

or an advertisement to push a

new product or service, even if

unrelated to the core purpose

for the communication. Under

CASL, if the communication

has as

a purpose

, to encourage

participation in some commercial

activity, the communication is

likely a CEM under CASL. If the

recipient is in Canada (or has a

Canadian web address) and has

not consented to the receipt of

such a CEM, the CEMmay be in

violation of CASL.

Because of the sweeping

nature of CASL, it’s wise to adopt

a comprehensive plan to evaluate

commercial communications

strategies and processes aimed

at CASL compliance. Following

are five areas in making a good

faith effort to comply with this

Canadian law:

1

Review Lists.

Organizations

should review all Canadian

addresses used for CEMmarketing

and communication efforts.

Consider adopting a practice

where the CASL-applicable

address list is updated each time a

newCanadian recipient is added

(or where a previous recipient opts

out or unsubscribes).

2

Consent.

For each Canadian

address used, consider

requesting express consent from

the recipient—either verbally

or in writing. The consent may

be given electronically. Some

organizations use opt-in links

within a CEM, with detailed

subscribe or opt-in forms to tailor

the communications for which

consent may or may not apply.

Consent may also be implied

by way of an existing business

or other relationship, or if a

recipient publishes or publicly

discloses their electronic contact

information. However, obtaining

express, written consent is a

safer approach. Consider using

a process to maintain records of

consents received (or rejected).

3

Information To Disclose.

For CEMs, the CEM should

identify the sender’s name and

business, the name of anyone

else on whose behalf the CEM is

sent, any email service provider,

a current mailing address, and a

phone number, email address or

web address. The CEM should

also contain an unsubscribe or

opt-out option.

4

Avoid Misleading Or

False CEMs.

Content and

disclosures should contain

accurate information about the

subject matter, URLs and other

information disclosed for CASL

and other regulatory compliance.

Avoid content or mechanisms

that are confusing or misleading.

5

Tools To Assist Compliance.

The Government of Canada

has issued helpful advisories to

assist businesses and individuals

in their compliance efforts. Find

the main page at this shortcut:

http://bit.ly/JHUkqf.

• Government of Canada

advisory entitled ‘Enforcement

Advisory – Notice for

businesses and individuals on

how to keep records of consent’

provides information on what

the government believes is

good record-keeping practices

for the consent required by

CASL. The advisory, issued on

July 27, 2016, may be viewed at:

http://news.gc.ca/web/article- en.do?nid=1104989.

• Government of Canada

guidance on implied consent

versus express consent, as well

as additional record-keeping

concepts may be viewed at

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/

com500/guide.htm.

• Compliance and Enforcement

Information Bulletin

CRTC 2014-326, which

provides guidelines to help

businesses develop corporate

compliance programs.

See

http://crtc.gc.ca/eng/

archive/2014/2014-326.htm.

Until CASL is better developed,

businesses should consider

removing advertising graphics

and hyperlinks when sending

unsolicited communications to

recipients in Canada who have not

consented to the receipt of a CEM

from the sender. If the recipient

consents (expressly or impliedly

as allowed by CASL) to the

receipt of CEMs, and if the sender

information and unsubscribe

process are included as required,

then the sender is in a far better

position to honor Canada’s effort

to ‘change Canada’s reputation

as spamhaven,’ being one of

three outcomes that, according

to the Canadian government,

define direct success for the

CASL legislation.

Cory Halliburton is a shareholder attorney with Weycer, Kaplan, Pulaski & Zuber, P.C., and he serves as

general counsel for PPAI. This article is for general informational purposes only; it is not legal advice, and

should not be relied upon as such. Each recipient is encouraged to consult independent legal counsel before

making any decisions concerning the matters in this communication.

Until CASL is

better developed,

businesses should

consider removing

advertising

graphics and

hyperlinkswhen

sending unsolicited

communications

to recipients in

Canadawhohave

not consented to

the receipt of aCEM

fromthe sender.

|

JUNE 2017

|

65

THINK