Previous Page  66 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 66 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

I

n an article titled “E-Message

Rules Mean Business”

published in

PPB

’s April 2016

issue, readers were advised of the

ins and outs of Canada’s Anti-

Spam Legislation (CASL). As

reported, CASL is an anti-spam

legal regime intended to protect

Canadians from receiving,

without effective consent,

commercial electronic messages

(CEMs), while also allowing a

global marketplace perspective

for commercial enterprise.

CASL was enacted in 2013 and

most portions became effective

in July 2015. However, on July 1,

2017, the final chapter of the law’s

rollout will take effect when CASL

provides a private right of action

for those who believe a sender of

a CEM has violated the law.

Indeed, the end of the

CASL transition period is

fast approaching.

To summarize, the core of this

north-of-the-border legislation

prohibits CEMs

unless

(1) the

person to whom the message is

sent consented to receiving it,

whether the consent is express

or implied; and (2) the message

identifies the sender, how to

contact the sender and how

to unsubscribe.

To give perspective to the

scope of CASL, its defined terms

are worth noting:

C

ommercial activity

means

any particular transaction,

act or conduct

or any regular

course of conduct that is of a

commercial character

, whether

or not the person who carries it

out does so in the expectation

of profit[.]”

• “

A

commercial electronic

message

is an electronic

message that, having regard

to the content of the message,

the hyperlinks in the message

to content on a website or

other database, or the contact

information contained in

the message,

it would be

reasonable to conclude has

as its purpose,

or one of

its purposes

, to encourage

participation in a

commercial

activity

, including an

electronic message that:

(a)

offers to purchase, sell,

barter or lease a

product

,

goods

, a

service

, . . .

(b)

offers to provide a

business, investment or

gaming opportunity;

(c) advertises

or

promotes

anything referred to in

paragraph (a) or (b); or

(d)

promotes a person,

including the public image of a

person, as being a person who

does anything referred to in

any of paragraphs (a) to (c), or

who intends to do so.”

Having spent another

year heavily involved in the

promotional products industry,

I surmise that in practically

all business-to-business or

Gates to Spam

Haven: Closed

Canada’s

E-Message Rules

Soon To Be

Fully Enforced

by

Cory Halliburton

64

|

JUNE 2017

|

THINK