Previous Page  79 / 134 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 79 / 134 Next Page
Page Background

|

DECEMBER 2016

|

77

THINK

dollar international printing

organization that has many

diverse product lines.

QCA is a reasonable starting

point for our industry, but is

made up of only 38 suppliers

(less than one percent of the

industry). While these companies

are relatively large entities,

there is limited rationale for a

single group of for-profit entities

establishing protocols on their

own and then marketing them as

standards for a broader industry.

During the aforementioned

panel discussion, it was stated

that QCA is a nonprofit entity,

which is supposed to sound like

a benefit, but that point is of no

relevance and is probably more

a critique of our tax code system.

How does a group of for-profit

companies create a 501(c)3 to

market themselves and end

up with a financial business

advantage? Another topic for a

different day.

Has QCA brought some

discipline, process and visibility

to compliance? Absolutely!

Hopefully this effort will

continue to evolve and be

shared to benefit the entire

promotional products industry.

However, having a small group of

suppliers position self-regulating

efforts as a base standard is

not appropriate for an industry

of our size. We recently had

another founding QCA member

comment to us that ADG’s

standards were higher than they

needed to be on a particular

product. That is okay at this time

and we will continue to maintain

that effort until more detailed

independent industry standards

are established.

It is important to recognize

that there are other suppliers,

like ADG, that have excellent

compliance and product safety

standards in place, and we can

all learn from each other to

get better. Some recent op-ed,

marketing and advertising

pieces in industry publications

have had a few non-industry

people question the quality

of “non-QCA” items. It’s an

approach that is, unfortunately,

self-serving and inaccurate

due to an absence of facts. This

type of miscommunication

is also damaging long-term

to our industry’s reputation.

The focus should be on bigger

challenges, strategies and

questions such as these:

1

Which independent entity is

best positioned to lead our

industry compliance effort?

We need PPAI’s leadership. If

we ask our end‑user clients

whether they aremore

interested in product quality

and compliance, or lobbying

efforts and brand positioning

of the industry, it is a safe bet

where their answers would

lie and where we should

spend our resources.

2

How do we best

manage components of

a compliance testing

process?

For an industry

already challenged with its

profitability model, figuring

out how to efficiently

test relatively low‑cost

items is critical. Suppliers

often share overseas

production facilities so it

makes sense to insist that

the supply chain cycle

start there. For example,

recent industry battery

charger recalls included

a number of suppliers

(including a QCA‑member

company) but has anyone

really identified whether

the issue was caused

by a common overseas

facility? Let’s start at the

beginning, establish sound

fundamental processes

and constantly challenge

ourselves to improve. (Full

disclosure: ADG does not

carry electronic items such

as battery chargers.)

Our end-user clients will

continue to demand that the

promotional products industry

establishes and maintains an

independent, high-quality

and long-term compliance

program. Proactive leadership

is needed by everyone to

establish industry standards.

This is not the responsibility

of just a few entities.

Send your comments on this Guest Viewpoint or your idea for a future column to

PPB@ppai.org

.

Bill Mahre, president of supplier ADG Promotional Products, has been in the promotional products

industry for nearly nine years with experience on both the distributor and supplier sides. Previously, he

held leadership roles with Procter & Gamble, Minnesota Twins Baseball Club, HealthEast Care System and

Minnesota Diversified Industries. He currently serves on the PPAI Product Responsibility Advisory Group.

Having a

small group of

suppliers position

self-regulating

efforts as a base

standard is not

appropriate

for an industry

of our size.